COMPARE

Instadata vs SocQ for Instagram data

Short version: want a multi-platform social data API that bills most Instagram endpoints in credits per returned result, with an asynchronous task workflow and follower-list collection? SocQ is built for that. Want a synchronous Instagram API with a published dollar price per 1,000 credits, reel transcripts, ads and collaborations, and a hosted MCP on the same key? Use Instadata.

We cannot say which is cheaper in dollars. SocQ's official pricing page lists credit rates per result. It did not publish the dollar price of a credit, or dollar plan prices, when checked on 10 Nov 2026 IST.

At a glance

Instadata SocQ
Model Instagram-first API, 28 endpoints, 9 families Multi-platform social data API; Instagram is one catalog among many (TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, and others on the pricing page)
Billing unit Credits; most reads 1 credit per result. Dollar price of a credit is published Credits based on returned results for most Instagram APIs; some endpoints priced per request. Official page: prices are estimates, final credits are settled by the task result
Headline paid rate $5 per 1,000 credits (monthly grant or free/monthly top-up); $4.50 per 1,000 on annual Credit rates only, for example Posts 0.34 credits/result, Comments 0.3, Profiles 0.6, Transcript 0.7. USD per credit not on the official pricing page this run
Free start 25 credits at signup, no card Not listed as a numeric free credit grant on the pricing page this run
Failed / empty Errors, timeouts and upstream failures never charged. Empty results free for 25/day/account, then 1 credit Official Instagram page: billing is based on normalized result records returned by the task. A general empty-result or failed-task dollar policy was not on the pricing page this run
Workflow Request then response (REST or MCP) Asynchronous: submit a task, poll status, read normalized results and follow next_cursor
Reel transcripts Built in: 1 credit plus 20 per started minute Official Instagram catalog includes Transcript API at 0.7 credits / result. Media without speech may return no record
Ads library Built in, 3 credits per ad Facebook Ad Library is listed on the SocQ pricing page. An Instagram ads endpoint was not listed in the Instagram catalog fetched this run. Unlisted is not proof of absence
Collaborations Built in, 3 credits per row Not listed on the Instagram API page fetched this run. Unlisted is not proof of absence
Followers / following lists Not listed as dedicated list endpoints on the Instadata /endpoints/ sheet this run Official catalog includes Followers List and Following List at 0.3 credits / result, plus Followers Count at 0.52
MCP Hosted at https://mcp.instadata.dev, OAuth or key Official MCP page: hosted Streamable HTTP at https://api.socq.ai/mcp. Discovery tools do not submit collection jobs; collections use the same credits as REST
Public-data boundary Public data only, no Instagram login, no Meta app Official Instagram page: private, restricted, removed or login-only content is outside the supported boundary. No customer Instagram OAuth

Where SocQ is better

  • Multi-platform catalog. One account covers many networks and ad libraries listed on the official pricing page, not only Instagram.
  • Follower and following lists. Those endpoints are published in the Instagram catalog, with per-result credit rates. Instadata's public endpoint sheet this run did not list equivalent list endpoints.
  • Fractional credit rates. Several Instagram endpoints are priced below 1 credit per result (for example posts at 0.34 credits/result). Whether that is cheaper in dollars depends on the unpublished USD value of a SocQ credit.
  • Async collection at catalog scale. The task, poll, and cursor pattern is designed for longer collection jobs, including MCP socq_execute / socq_get_task.
  • Stories, highlights, post likers, and comment replies appear as named Instagram APIs on the official catalog. Do not assume Instadata offers the same list just because a family exists on our sheet; check /endpoints/.

Where Instadata is better

  • Published dollar pricing. You can budget 1-credit reads at $5.00 or $4.50 per 1,000 credits without asking sales for a credit-to-dollar rate.
  • Synchronous request then response. No required task polling for ordinary profile, post, comment or transcript lookups.
  • Ads and collaborations on the Instagram API. Published rates, same key.
  • Transcript pricing you can map to video length. 1 credit plus 20 per started minute, rather than a flat 0.7 credits/result whose dollar value is unknown here.
  • Agent-first MCP with priced tool descriptions. The MCP page and docs say each tool description includes params, unit and price. list_endpoints is free. call_endpoint is billed at the path you pass. Hosted at https://mcp.instadata.dev.
  • Errors are free. Errors, timeouts and upstream failures are never charged. Empty results are free up to 25 per day per account, then cost 1 credit.

Same task, both ways

Collect recent posts for a public username

Instadata (synchronous, 1 credit per post returned):

curl "https://api.instadata.dev/v1/instagram/channel-posts?handle=natgeo" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer ik_live_..."

SocQ (official async pattern; Posts API is 0.34 credits / result):

curl -X POST "https://api.socq.ai/v1/instagram/posts" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SOCQ_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"usernames":["natgeo"],"results_limit":25}'

# Poll GET /v1/tasks/{task_id}, then read results

Which should you pick?

  • Pick SocQfor cross-platform collection, follower-list research, or async catalog jobs, once you have a clear dollar rate for credits in your account.
  • Pick Instadataif you want Instagram transcripts, ads or collaborations, a published $ per 1,000 credits, synchronous REST, or a hosted MCP with priced tools.
  • Use both.You can collect bulk or multi-network data in SocQ and use Instadata for live Instagram lookups and transcripts.

For agents / MCP

If an agent is the caller, this is the case Instadata was built for:

  • One Instagram API and one hosted MCP.Agents call https://mcp.instadata.dev directly.
  • Priced tool descriptions.The MCP page and docs say each tool description includes its params, unit and price. list_endpoints is free. call_endpoint is billed at the path you pass.
  • Same JSON recordin REST and MCP.
  • Built in:reel transcripts, the Ads library, and collaborations, all in the same API and MCP.
  • Billing:errors, timeouts and upstream failures are never charged. Empty results are free up to 25 per day per account, then cost 1 credit.
  • Setup:Cursor (mcp.json) · Claude · ChatGPT · Overview · Docs
  • Registry:dev.instadata/instagram@1.0.0 (official MCP Registry)
  • Tools:get_profile, get_channel_posts, get_post_stats, get_comments, get_transcript, get_summary, search_hashtag, download_media, list_endpoints (free), call_endpoint.
  • Pricing:free/monthly top-ups cost $5 per 1,000 credits; annual top-ups cost $4.50 per 1,000. Accounts start with 25 free credits.

SocQ also hosts MCP at https://api.socq.ai/mcp, billed on the same credits as REST. Pick Instadata when you need a published dollar credit rate and Instagram-specific transcripts, ads and collaborations, not because "MCP exists only here."

FAQ

Is Instadata cheaper than SocQ?

We cannot say from official public pages alone. SocQ lists credit rates per result but not USD per credit on the pricing page checked this run. Compare after you know your SocQ credit price.

Does Instadata need an Instagram login?

No. Public data only, no login, no Meta app.

Is Instadata affiliated with Meta?

No. Instadata is an independent public-data API.

Does SocQ replace Meta's Graph API?

Their official Instagram page says no. SocQ is for supported public results; use Meta's Graph API for authorized account management or publishing.

SocQ pricing and Instagram catalog checked on 10 Nov 2026 IST. Tell us if something is out of date.